African American Democrats of Montgomery County (AACDMC) Questionnaire

                      Responses from Marc Elrich     July 14, 2002

 

GO BACK to the Questionnaires and Surveys       

 

You can scroll through this document, or use these links to jump to questions you are interested in:

PK-12 Education

Housing

Civil Rights/Justice

Voting Rights and Representation

Health Care

Transportation

Economic Development

Other Information

 

 

 

The following are AADCMC critical issues. Beneath each question please briefly explain how you would address this issue. List any activities or legislation that you have supported or sponsored in the past which help clarify your answer.

 

PK-12 EDUCATION     

 

Minority parents have voiced concerns about special needs and gifted and talented programs. Is there a basis for their concerns? If no, please elaborate. If yes, how would you address their concerns?

 

            As a teacher I believe the concerns are legitimate. Whatever the “intention” of special education, the reality is that students who are placed in special education programs rarely catch up and rarely make their way out of them.  Instead of being programs that allow the schools system to provide remediation and support, they are too often a permanent placement.  The achievement gap that identified the student is rarely closed, even after receiving years of special education.  I believe we need more aggressive remediation of students who are not performing on grade level, but that the students should not be required to have been identified as eligible for special education to get those services.  I favor putting more resources in schools for the purpose of providing additional support to students who need the help. 

 

            I believe that we identify too many students as G&T, even when they are not, regardless of race, often to quell concerns that parents have about what regular classrooms are like.  I’m in favor of teaching a more rigorous curriculum to all children, and setting the same high expectations for all students.  Parents shouldn’t have to worry about their child being in a “regular” classroom.   Children shouldn’t have to be identified as G&T to receive a rigorous academic education.  I teach fourth grade.  I teach non-G&T, almost entirely minority classes.  In math for example, I teach the fourth and fifth grade curriculum to all my students  and have a great deal of success doing it.  This year I again placed a third of my students (normally can place 20-25% above) above grade level by year end, whereas none were above at the beginning of the year.  A G&T label is not a qualification for exposure to, nor a requirement for success in, a rigorous academic program.

 

            At the same time, I’m aware from talking to parents and to older students that there are assumptions, by others, that students are forced to carry as baggage.  My own son, who attended Blair, made it clear that all children are not treated the same and that some students enter school to the assumption that they will not perform on par with their white peers.  We need to examine the who gets in G&T programs, how it’s decided and evaluate whether there’s a difference in how students with similar grades are offered different opportunities in school.

 

 

There is an achievement gap between minority and majority students. What is your plan for eliminating this gap?

  

            The achievement gap has been allowed to persist for far too long.  For most of the last forty years, efforts to reduce it have been half-hearted and focused on gimmicky curriculum changes rather than serious investment in programs that would make a difference.  At the same time the curriculum, in particular the latest revision, has become more minimalist in it’s requirements and threatens to create a two-tiered instructional system that, 50 years ago, would have been labeled separate and unequal.  As a teacher, I’m committed to closing the gap and there are concrete steps we can take that will make a difference.

 

Reduce class size.  K-2 should be capped at 15-17 students per classroom, grades 3-5 at 20 and grades 6 and above at 25.  Smaller class sizes make teachers more effective and provide students more time with the teacher.  Class size reduction is the most effective program shown to be effective in improving outcomes.  While it is most effective in early grades, the reality is that most students have not benefited from recent changes in this area, meaning that they are products of the old system.  Our high failure rate and the persistence of the gap across grade levels indicates the need for immediate action beyond the Early Childhood Initiative and the K-2 class size reductions in targeted schools.

 

Provide academic assistance based on needs that don’t require a special ed evaluation.  A student should not need a special ed label to get assistance when they are falling behind.  The fact that they don’t have a special ed label doesn’t mean that they don’t need the help.  We need to be pro-active in identifying and helping at-risk learners.

 

Allow grouping practices that are designed to bring students to grade level, but don’t allow grouping that becomes the equivalent of a tracking system.  The grouping of students for whom targeted remediation and support is needed should be for the purpose of giving them the skills to perform on a par, and doing the same work, as their peers.  The earlier we intervene, the less this should be needed in the upper grades.  The real is key providing students with necessary reading skills and fundamental math skills, upon which all subsequent course work is based.  The fact that so many students are put into low groups year after year is a serious problem.  That pattern points out a flaw in the system.  It focuses on a student making only a year’s progress.  Once a student has fallen behind, making a year’s progress only insures that they will continue to lag behind.

 

Strengthen the curriculum.  The curriculum needs to have the same expectations for all students.  It needs to be rigorous and challenging, and go beyond preparing students for functional assessments.  In my view, the alignment of the curriculum with the state outcomes (which were basically minimal standards that were tested on the MSPAP’s) was, and is, a serious mistake.  One of the ironies of the current system is that for years the goal was to close the gap, so we looked at the CRT’s, the CTBS’s the SAT’s and saw the gap and thought we could close it.  After all, why should minority students perform differently than white students on these tests.  But recently, faced with a failure to close the gap, new energy has gone into creating tests that will make the gap disappear through lower standards, creative scoring and by aligning the curriculum to teach to these new tests.  This is the wrong way to close the gap.  I believe that all students have the ability to meet the same standards on all tests they are given, and that we were right in focusing on why the gap was persisting on these tests.

Expand the Early Childhood Initiative and put in place wrap around services, including family supports, so that children come to school prepared and able to learn.  The issues that affect the emergence of learning skills include more than academics. 

Provide more before school and after school programs.  Too many students go home to empty houses because their parents work.  Often they have the responsibility for care of their siblings.  Many students don’t have the time to homework at home, or their parents aren’t able to help them.  After school programs can provide additional support, particularly academic support, that will insure that students can successfully complete assignments out of the classroom.

 

HOUSING        Back to Top                                

 

What initiatives do you propose to build and finance affordable housing (rent/own) for low and middle-income residents in Montgomery County?

 

            I’d support more stringent application of the MPDU requirements to stop developers from buying their way out.  I’d support low interest loan programs and down payment assistance to help make home ownership possible.  I will support expansion of the current level of funding for affordable housing because it’s not enough to even come close to meeting the needs that exist. 

 

            I think we need to place greater emphasis on retaining the affordable housing stock that exists.  Each year we are losing more houses from the affordable housing stock than we can build, so that we end up with a net reduction in housing supply.  Many of the existing affordable units can be purchased and rehabbed and maintained as affordable housing at a lower cost per unit than the cost of producing new units.  So I think we need to put greater emphasis on retention of the stock we do have.  If we can do that, then Iíd like to see more work with tenants to help them buy their existing units so that they become owners and have the opportunity to build equity. 

 

            In Takoma Park I’ve been a strong proponent of affordable housing and rewrote the laws on tenant opportunity to purchase.  We now have four buildings where the tenants, low and moderate income and predominantly minority tenants, are in various stages of trying to buy their buildings.   If they are successful, must units will be purchased for between $55,000 and $75,000, something that is impossible to match with new construction.

 

            The City is also working closely with non-profits.  We have projects with Victory Housing and MHP that have involved helping them acquire rental property which they will be able to keep as affordable housing.   Finally, Takoma Park is the only Maryland city with rent stabilization.  Our council has had a twenty year commitment to maintaining the stock of affordable housing through the program.  We have 4,000 rental units that could not be replaced if they were allowed to rent at market value, meaning that thousands of families could easily be displaced if rents weren’t controlled.  I’m proud of my city and my record in leading the effort to preserve affordable housing.

 

 

Do you support initiatives to create equal access to quality affordable housing for "all" senior citizens? 

              ___x___Yes           ______No                     ______Not Sure

I would support monitoring of county programs to ensure that access to housing programs is based on need and that all applicants receive similar treatment in terms of level of funding, and the type and location of housing made available to them.

 

CIVIL RIGHTS/JUSTICE        Back to Top                                     

 

Would you support a Civilian Police Review Board in the County? If no, explain. If yes, what would be its structure and how would it operate?

 

            I do support the creation of a Civilian Police Review Board, but without changes in State law, it’s difficult to create a board with sufficient powers.  I think the board should be a civilian board with adequate investigative authority and should have the power to make recommendations to the Chief of Police regarding disciplinary actions that might be warranted.  In Takoma Park we looked at how such a board might work and, after talking with frustrated members of the Prince Georges County Board, came away feeling that a Board would be hamstrung under current law.  I will be willing to work with efforts to change the state law because I’m convinced it’s possible to balance the rights of officers with the rights of the public to have accountability.

Legislative and executive actions must be taken at all levels of government to eliminate "racial profiling."  What actions would you take to eliminate racial profiling?

 

            I think the County needs to monitor on an on-going basis and should do an analysis based on different parts of the County.  I’d envision the results being analyzed by an independent outside review agency and by the Civilian Review Board.

 

 

Minorities face glaring disparities in the application of the death penalty. Would you support legislation that would abolish the death penalty?

              ___x___Yes           ______No                     ______Not Sure

      I don’t support the death penalty for numerous reasons and will support and testify in favor of any state bill that proposes doing away with it.

 

 

What is your general philosophy on protecting the civil liberties of all citizens, while at the same time curbing illegal and unlawful activity?

 

            I think that the fundamental rights guaranteed us in the Bill of Rights are not to be tampered with.  I oppose secret courts and the use of police powers that violate those rights.  If there is sufficient evidence to warrant such intrusions, then there should be sufficient evidence to allow law enforcement agencies to get proper authorization from the courts.  The granting of extraordinary police powers to the State concerns me.  Our own history shows all too well how those powers can be abused, i.e. the internment of Japanese Americans during World War II, the efforts to infiltrate and disrupt the Vietnam anti-war movement and the civil rights movement.  The latter efforts were done in absence of the legal authority to carry them out.  I would be concerned that the granting of exceptional authority to agencies could easily lead those agencies to decide what groups they deem to be a threat, whether or not those groups are simply exercising their rights to free speech and assembly.  We even saw hints of this attitude when members of this Administration equated opposing the President’s domestic policies with creating divisiveness that aided America’s enemies.  I would hate to see that extreme view become the practice of government.

 

Are you committed to sound crime prevention strategies such as investment in youth programs and in entry-level skills development?

              ___x___Yes           ______No                     ______Not Sure

 

            I’ve always been a proponent of expanding youth programs and services, and a greater focus on job training.  Again, my record in Takoma Park shows that I’ve been one the advocates for expanding youth services.  Most recently, I proposed using bond financing to build a community center to better serve our residents, particularly the young and the elderly.  The bond enables us to build a major facility with both recreation and educational features and I supported it despite the fact that it requires increased taxes to support it.  You can count on me to bring the same commitment to the County Council.

 

            Regarding job training specifically, we need more technical education programs in our high schools.  We leave students who are not going on to college, totally unprepared for the world of work when then leave school.  We need course work that makes it possible for students to prepare themselves for work when they leave high school.  The school system should be working with the trades and with the high tech council to develop training programs that offer something more than the ability to work at McDonalds.  This is currently not a priority because the school system prefers to pretend that everyone is and should be going to college.  We have a large number of students who are not taking that path and while I believe that the core curriculum should leave them prepared to go on to college should they choose to, the school system needs to do more prepare them with the skills they will need when they enter the workforce.

  

 

 

VOTING RIGHTS and REPRESENTATION  Back to Top              

 

The right to vote is a cornerstone of our democracy. What steps would you take to ensure that minority voters fully participate in the electoral process and are not prevented from exercising their constitutional right to vote?

 

            Fortunately, Montgomery County is not Florida.  The biggest problems that I’ve witnessed are locations of polling places that put people who use transit at a disadvantage and the hours of voting.  I’d favor making election day a paid holiday.  We could extend the polling hours, extend voting over two days, or vote on weekends when more people are not working.  I would support any effort aimed at increasing voter participation.  I think the State and County took positive steps with the new voting machines.

 

            At the broader level, the creation of districts that offer minorities a chance to win election is important.  That’s why I opposed the original effort to change the state legislative districts 18 and 20 boundaries so that while Dana Dembrow was moved out only to be replaced by another incumbent.  I thought that the creation of an open seat should have been left to the voters to fill and I spoke out and testified against the boundaries that were later thrown out in court. I’ve been supportive of Dr. Murray’s campaign in District 20.

 

 

HEALTH CARE    Back to Top                                                                                         

  There are disparities in the availability of quality health care for low-income and minority populations in the County. What initiatives would you design to eliminate these disparities?

 

            I think the County made a serious mistake with the privatization of health clinics that reduced health care availability for our low income residents.  I support the state legislation that created health care access for children and I will support its expansion to cover all uninsured residents.  I’ve spoken for and am a member of the statewide coalition pushing for health care reform and the creation of a statewide system of universal coverage.

In the meantime, the County needs to make sure that we have adequate available health care and that people are not turned away because of a lack of providers or a lack of ability to pay.  I’d favor doing a needs assessment in the county, and then crafting legislation that will allow us to get health care to the 100,000 plus uninsured county residents.  I also think it’s critical that we use schools as access points to get services to students and their families.  We often see health care needs at school, when parents are unable to take their children to doctors unless a situation gets bad enough to warrant a trip to the emergency room.  This is no way to provide health care.  You can be sure that if the children aren’t accessing health care, neither are the parents.  If it means re-establishing clinics, or if there’s an equally effective way of using private practitioners, I will support funding that insures health care is available to those who need it.

 

 

Maryland is experiencing a crisis in the availability of mental health services. Why do you think the crisis exists? How would you remedy this situation?

 

            The mental health crisis exists because funding mental health services is a low political priority at all levels, from the feds, down to the state and the county.  Maryland chronically underfunds mental health care while knowing full well that the level of funding is inadequate It’s not an oversight, it’s deliberate.  So we need to pressure the State to do more.

 

            But in our current crisis it is irresponsible and morally unacceptable for the County to refuse to provide funding that would keep clinics open and able to serve the existing population.  This is even more critical as gray zone patients are about to be cut loose by the State and will not be able to maintain coverage on their own.  Regardless of who is ultimately responsible, the County’s posture of letting these needs go unmet is unsatisfactory.  The level of funding required to ensure the viability of these services will not break the county budget.   In fact the county just lobbied and got Annapolis to let the County give a $16 million tax break to Discovery (following $50 million in tax breaks granted to Marriott Corp. in recent years).  If we can afford multi-million dollar corporate welfare, then we can afford to take care of the welfare of our own citizens.  I will support funding as needed to keep clinics open and able to serve the population, until we are successful in getting the State to pay its fair share.

 

 

TRANSPORTATION     Back to Top              

 

Do you support funding of a long-term comprehensive regional transportation program that may include the:

Purple Line                               ____x__Yes             ______No          ______Not Sure

Mid-County Connector            _______Yes             ___x__No          ______Not Sure

Expansion of County's Ride-On services ___x_Yes   ______No        ______Not Sure

 

            I’m firmly committed to the expansion of rail through both the Inner Purple Line and the Corridor Cities Transitway.  I favor additional parking at the Metro lots and expansion of the Red Line Metro at both ends, to Washington Grove in the west and to Olney on the east.  I served 18 months on the Transportation Policy Review Task Force and all the studies we did showed that we cannot build our way out of congestion.  We did identify almost $6 billion in local road improvements that would increase mobility at the local level.  I support the Rte 28-198 widening that will give us a continuous east-west connector from Rockville to I-95.

            We have a serious gap we have to close because we were able to identify $9 billion in road and transit projects that need to be done, not including the major freeways that are being discussed.  One of the serious challenges, and the reason I’ve favored the local road/Mass Transit approach is that the big projects provide little local relief while consuming all the dollars that are available.  We’re going to have to stretch just to build the Inner Purple Line, but it is doubtful that it will ever be built if it’s in competition with the ICC and the Techway for dollars.  And this isn’t just a County problem.  The State faces a $1 billion dollar deficit next year that then balloons up to close to $2 billion.  If the State struggles for funding, my priority is going to Mass Transit dollars and funding the Thornton Commission.  In the real world these are the likely choices we will face, so we need priorities. 

 

            At the same time we can reduce pressure on our roads by slowing down development and by using the Adequate Public Facilities Ordinance to insure that roads and schools are in place before development is permitted to go forward.  The other side of the transportation question is how do we service the development that it spawns.  When you have a 10 year back log on school modernizations of almost a billion dollars, when you can’t provide adequate public safety services and when you claim you can’t afford health care and to keep mental health clinics open, it does not make sense to push for additional new development that will only place greater demands on already limited resources.

           

ECONOMIC  DEVELOPMENT      Back to Top                                                                                                                                              

 

Minorities have difficulty obtaining access to operating capital for start-up business purposes. How would you address access to capital?

 

            I’d like to see the County put more emphasis on small business assistance, both in the form of loans and training.  Almost everything the County does is for the corporate giants on whom we have bestowed tens of millions of dollars in tax breaks.  Meanwhile, in the current budget the executive has further cut the small business program.  Most businesses in the County are small and most jobs in the county come from this sector, yet it is the least supported.  In order to address the minority issue, we have to address the neglect of this sector first.

 

            If we can increase funding, then we need to have the necessary assistance in place through loan programs and through technical assistance that would help would-be owners strengthen their business plans.  Beyond that we need to monitor who then receives assistance and we could also examine local banking practices to see who receives loans, as is often done when the Community Reinvestment Act is invoked to examine residential lending patterns of banks.

What programs and services should be provided to encourage and assist minority business entrepreneurship?

 

            As I stated above, we need a combination of loan programs and technical assistance programs available.

 

 

In order to stimulate economic development and help eradicate past discrimination, do you support contracting preferences in the public sector for underutilized minority businesses?

              _____x_Yes           ______No                     ______Not Sure

 

            I do support laws that give preference to minority and women owned businesses.  In evaluating contracts it’s legitimate to allow extra points to be awarded for such businesses so that who we contract with is a better reflection of the community.

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION      Back to Top                                                                                            

 

Provide any other examples (limited to space below) that you would like us to consider in the AADCMC endorsement process.

 

            My commitment to racial equality and social justice is long standing.  In the 60’s and early 70’s, as a civil rights activist, working to integrate the University of Maryland and exposing and trying to stop university investment in South Africa. 

            I’ve served 15 years on the Takoma Park City Council.  I’m proud of being the driving force behind the city’s rent stabilization laws which have allowed us to maintain our stock of affordable housing and has prevented the displacement of thousands of predominantly minority families. I’ve always argued that what we save a family in rent allows them to put food on the table for their children.  I proposed and succeeded in getting the City to hire community organizers to reach out to the minority population, to empower  and to help them organize even when the results aren’t flattering to the city.

            At the county level I’ve been a proponent of the living wage, expanding county services to reach those in need, greater funding to reduce class size and to close the gap in minority achievement which is an outrage for a system that’s been integrated for forty years.  I’m willing to lead, to say things that are true even when it makes people uncomfortable, and as a candidate who won’t take money from developers, I’m beholden only to the public interest.

     

 

 

BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS--This question is for elected officials only                                    

 

Give examples of your support/recommendation of minority appointments to state and local boards and commissions.